Return to Nicholas Johnson's Iowa Rain Forest ("Earthpark") Web Site

Return to Nicholas Johnson's Blog, FromDC2Iowa
 
 

[Note: This material is copyright by the Des Moines Register, and is reproduced here as a matter of "fair use" for non-commercial, educational purposes only. Any other use may require the prior approval of the Des Moines Register.]

Pomerantz, a former regents president, said Gartner, the current president, should never have been appointed and is "not a great leader."

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Pomerantz got on the board in the same manner Gartner did. And like Pomerantz, Gartner is upsetting people with his strong management style.

Pomerantz, a big supporter of Gov. Terry Branstad's, was placed on the board by Branstad. Pomerantz says in his book he insisted on being president if he was going on the board, so Branstad made it happen.

But somehow, when Gov. Tom Vilsack did the same thing with Gartner, it was bad.

Their problem isn't their differences but their similarities. Iowa law says the regents are to run the state universities - not the faculty - and that's what Pomerantz did and Gartner is doing.

Gartner's taking heat over the search brouhaha. Pomerantz took it when he put Martin Jischke in charge of Iowa State.

Pomerantz and Gartner were put in their presidencies by two governors who wanted changes made at the state universities. So they tapped two hard-working guys who love the state and who'd been very successful in changing other big enterprises.

Anyone who ever worked for the two men will tell you they are tough bosses who set high standards. If you don't meet their standards, well, life can be miserable, as David Skorton discovered when he wasn't achieving the goals the regents set for him.

He left, and that upset his old pals in Iowa City. Change is now in the offing there. That's naturally making people nervous, just as we all get the jitters when the old boss leaves and a new one is yet to arrive.

Life was jittery for some at Iowa State back when Pomerantz was trying to get that university to shed duplication and become what was called an engine of economic development. ISU folks got so upset at Pomerantz they succeeded in blocking his reappointment in the Iowa Senate.

Today, Iowa State is a better, more focused institution because of the changes Pomerantz initiated. While ISU's faculty is holding conferences on renewable fuels in the 21st century, the folks in Iowa City are spending their time bashing Gartner and debating "no-confidence" resolutions.

It's a risky game for university communities to erode public confidence in regents. When liberal Johnson County legislators trash the regents, they make it that much easier for right-wing lawmakers to raise questions about the six-figure paychecks, sweet benefits, light teaching loads and outside incomes of some faculty members. (Breach a hole in the buffer regents provide to universities, and you never know who will come through it.)

There are other parallels between Gartner and Pomerantz. Both were undercut by other board members who are jealous or who wanted to be board president.

Both men are quite upsetting to university types who prefer more docile regents - you know, the ones who care primarily for good seats or parking spots at football games. Sleepy regents like these are one reason our state universities don't rank as well as some in other states.

So maybe it's time we start electing the state Board of Regents. Other states do. Let the governance of the institutions be determined by the direct whims of voters every other November.

Think the Iowa City community would like that?