Clean Water is Basic "Iowa Environmental Project"
Cindy Hildebrand
June 6, 2005
[Note: This email in response to Nicholas Johnson, Unfocused and Unfunded, Rain Forest Inspires Mostly Questions," Des Moines Register [Letters], June 5, 2005, was received June 6 and reproduced here with the permission of the author.]
I sympathize with the worried citizens of Johnson County, and submitted (polite) testimony years ago, asking financial questions and expressing concern. I also called Senator Grassley's office with more (polite) concern when $50 million in federal tax money was first proposed for what was obviously a nebulous proposition. It was clear from talking to his staffer, however, that concern regarding CHILD was futile.
I also communicated (politely) with David Oman, and received the usual friendly fog of assurances. I am impressed that you have maintained such public politesse over the years in regard to this project. I no longer feel very polite about it.
Especially since, with the oft-promised major donors nowhere in sight, I understand that project leaders are once again planning to turn to state taxpayers within a year or two, even though Iowa is so strapped that only a paltry $5 million is available to try to clean our filthy water. Seems to me that clean water is a fairly basic "Iowa environmental project."
Thanks in particular for your continuing efforts to bring financial analysis of this Protean proposal back to a more rational plane. What I'm wondering now is whether there is any possibility of attempts at more federal funding. I find it hard to believe that further federal funding would even be considered, after all the national bad publicity. But then I still can't believe that this mysterious and chameleonic endeavor got fifty million in the first place.
Best wishes --
Cindy Hildebrand