GALE B/CASTING CO., INC. (Assignor) and WGN CONTINENTAL FM CO.
(Assignee), For Assignment of Licensee of Station WFMT,
BALH-1039, Public Notice
12 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 809
March 27, 1968
JUDGES:
The
Commission by Chairman Hyde and Commissioners Lee, Cox, Loevinger, and
DISSENT:
DISSENTING
OPINION OF COMMISSIONER NICHOLAS JOHNSON
Before
the Federal Communications Commission in this matter is a request by WGN
Continental FM Company for a grant without hearing of its application to buy
the license for WFMT (FM). The Commission has decided to grant the request. I
must dissent.
WFMT
operates on one of the most desirable FM frequencies in the
Transferee-WGN
Continental FM Company is a subsidiary of the Tribune Company, which commands
one of the nation's most extensive communications empires. The company's
holdings are concentrated principally in
Outside
As a
broadcast multiple-owner, the Tribune Company also cuts an imposing national
figure. It owns the licenses for WPIX-FM and WPIX-TV of
The
Tribune Company is itself principally controlled by the McCormick family, which
is prominent in
Just
yesterday, on March 26, 1968, this Commission testified before the Senate
Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of its continuing allegiance to
long-held FCC policies designed to "promote diversification of control of
the media of mass communications". Statement of Rosel H. Hyde, Chairman,
Federal Communications Commission, before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and
Monopoly of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on S. 1312, The Failing
Newspaper Act. Yet today we turn around and approve this important addition to
the
The
Department of Justice felt called upon to investigate thoroughly the antitrust
implications of this proposed acquisition. The Department ultimately decided
against a court action. But this hardly excuses the FCC's disinterest in an
investigation of its own through the hearing process. The Commission's
responsibility to disapprove broadcast transfers which threaten "the
public interest" is far broader than the Department's authority to
prosecute commercial arrangements which "restrain trade" or
"tend to lessen competition".
For the
FCC the relevant market is the market-place of ideas. This acquisition by the
Tribune may not threaten competition in
Indeed,
the Commission is itself considering the promulgation of a regulation which
would proscribe any individual entity from acquiring inore than a single
broadcast service in a given area. Under this rule, the transfer which we have
today allowed to pass without so much as a hearing, would be defined as
inherently and on its face contrary to the public interest. Presumably, if the
Commission rates multiple ownership in a single market a sufficient evil to
consider the adoption of a general prohibition binding on all cases, then the
degree of concentration present in the particular case before us warrants at
least the sort of second look it would get in a hearing.