January 19, 1999

To: CLS Class

From: Nicholas Johnson

Re: January 20, 1999 Class



Let’s recap where we’ve been, where we’re at, where we’re going.

Where we’re at; bottom line for tomorrow evening:

Where we’ve been:

We’ve held our first meeting.  We have a Web site: https://www.nicholasjohnson.org/cls99 The classroom has Internet access. So we projected on the screen, and walked through the Web site-posted January 6 memo, “Assignments and Overview.” To provide early illustrations of the range of cyberlaw issues available for seminar papers, we went through David Loundy’s “E-Law Update #9 Parts 1 and 2” and made reference to the assigned Findings of Fact 1-48 from ACLU v. Reno as one of the best factual descriptions of the Internet/Web.  Prior to that class a hard copy memo, “Opening Seminar Session/Assignments, “ was distributed via your mail folders. (Each of the documents just referred to are available online at our Web site.)

Where we’re going:

As with any “seminar,” our ultimate goal and purpose is to provide each of you with the experience of (a) initial research, (b) topic formulation (and revision), (c) outlining, (d) research, (e) writing, (f) editing, (g) my editing of your paper, leading to your (h) rewriting (as much as necessary; minimum one rewrite), along with (i) presentations along the way of your “work in progress,” and ending with (j) your presentation to the seminar of your final paper.  We want to help you help yourself to improve your writing and presentation skills.

There are two documents you should read in this connection.

Both of these pieces came out of frustrating experiences with student writing in the past.  I recommend them to you as a way to help ensure this seminar remains the pleasant and productive experience it should be for all of us. 
Cyberlaw Privacy Case Assignments

Note: Cases available from the David Loundy “E-Law Locator” page, URL: http://www.Loundy.com/E-LAW_Links.html#privacy
 
 
Baek, Misook Smyth v. Pillsbury
Brick, Matt 2600 Case (“Documents Available” from EPIC)
Bryant, Armikka A.C.L.U. v. Miller
Davis, Connie Andersen Consulting LLP v. UOP
Fitzgerald, Kelly Bernstein v. U.S. Department of State
Graham, Bradley Bourke v. Nissan (unreported)
Grey, Celia Davis v. Gracey
Kalinsky, Robert Karn v. U.S. Department of State
Kruger, Scott McVeigh v. Cohen
Kuli, Rumi In the Matter of Quad/Graphics, Inc. v. Southern
Neal, Steve State ex rel. Wilson-Simmons v. Lake County
Oliver, Lauren Stern v. Delphi (right of publicity)
Perkins, John Steve Jackson Games v. U.S. Secret Service
Solberg, Sean Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986
Wilson, Kenneth EU Database Directive
Wosmek, Carl Options for Promoting Privacy on the NII