Return to Nicholas Johnson Main Web Page
Economics of Law Practice Seminar
Fall 2000
Report of August 31, 2000 Seminar Session
[Nicholas Johnson/University of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa]
Posted September 1, 2000


Our primary focus August 31 was on participants' proposed, tentative topics. (With regard to all, see Aspects of Delivery/Funding Mechanisms below. See also the "September 1 E-mail" regarding topic presentations September 7.) They were as follows:

Molly: Contingency fees generally. The origin and history of the practice. Client reactions to what may, at the conclusion of trial, seem an "excessive" fee.

Scott: A number of proposals, including: How public attitudes regarding the timely utilization of legal services are shaped by the secondary schools' civics curriculum.

Allyson: The mechanisms and practices that can ease the collection of fees in divorce cases when the parties may be contemplating bankruptcy.

Armikka: (1) An exploration of the idea, and design of an instrument (e.g., a checklist), for non-lawyers wishing to evaluate their potential need for a lawyer with regard to specific prospective transactions or conditions. (2) The marketing of pre-paid legal services via Web site. (3) An exploration of the potential legal ethics/professional responsibility issues involved in the provision of legal services via Web site and e-mail.

Dan: (1) The implications of a "loser pays all" system for allocating costs and attorneys' fees. (2) The implications for lawyers' compensation of alternatives to the U.S. system of tort law (e.g., workmen's compensation, the New Zealand system). (3) The economic realities of a small firm practice.

Robert: An exploration of the implications of a legal services analogy to what, in health care, takes the form of an HMO, perhaps in the form of a closed Web site (including the economic incentives to "legal wellness" and reduced costs).

Evan: The economics of attorneys' provision of alternative dispute resolution services, with emphasis on challenges confronting recent law school graduates entering this field. (Possible subjects: how to overcome lack of experience and clients' preference for more experienced lawyers; how to gain a client base; level of interest by large firms in new lawyers with these skills.)


Additional Alternative Legal Services Delivery (August 31)

Quick Links to Contents from Prior Week (August 24)

Introduction
Aspects of Delivery/Funding Mechanisms
Additional Funding Mechanisms Discussed but not Chosen
Basic Research Sources/Techniques
Research Paper Schedule


Introduction: First Cut at Alternative Legal Services Delivery

During our first seminar session, August 24, 2000, we made a good start at brainstorming and listing a number of alternative means of delivering legal services. They included:
 
 
  • hourly billing
  • fixed fee for designated service (e.g., simple will; tax return)
  • contingent fee
  • pro bono
  • bartering (see Time Dollar Institute)
  • Legal Services Corporation
  • legal clinics (such as that at the UI College of Law)
  • salary from law firm
  • salary from business as "in-house" counsel
  • salary from non-profit or foundation
  • government lawyers (e.g., city attorney, state or federal agencies)
  • agencies' consumer advocates
  • pre-paid legal services (e.g., as union benefit)
  • imbedded legal services (i.e., part of auto insurance premium)
  • retainer (fee for potential availability of lawyer)
  • freelance lawyers' lawyer
  • contract with "temp" business offering lawyers to firms
  • public prosecutors
  • public defenders
  • court appointed lawyers
  • stock ownership in exchange for startup's legal services
  • statutory attorneys' fees (possibly double or treble damages)
  • public interest law firm (funding from donors or foundations) 

We also discussed some more "creative" ideas:


Aspects of Delivery of Legal Services and Funding Mechanisms
(With sample, not definitive, annotations and questions)

Note: As you are thinking about topics and outlines, here are some suggestions of aspects of your thinking, research and analysis you will want to include. They are not a "requirement" if they are totally inappropriate to your paper. Otherwise there should be a good reason for omitting them (which there may well be).

Description of Method of Delivery/Funding

Origins of the Method Public Policy and Social Consequences Legal Ethics Economics of the Method
Additional Funding Mechanisms Discussed but not Chosen

Basic Research Sources/Techniques

Note: There's nothing here unique or profound regarding research, but the following obvious suggestions may be worth a quick review.


Economics of Law Practice Seminar
Research Paper Schedule
Fall 2000

Note: This is the "outline" view of a PowerPoint presentation of the papers' schedule from the class August 24, 2000.

Overview
concept of “mileposts”
penalties for failure to meet
maximums
earlier completion encouraged
open to discussion/modification now -- but not later

Mileposts
research
topic selection
outline
first “final” draft
conference
“final, final” draft
presentations to seminar
Web (HTML) formatting, uploading

Research
begins immediately
continues throughout final, final draft
initial survey
initial completed
continuing general
completion “final”
additional as needed

Research Formatting
Blue Book citation form required
why that’s important for your sake
use Internet-available sources
to the maximum extent possible
but not to the exclusion of essential sources
obtain/preserve URL sites for sources

Topic Selection
make list of your topic options
make your selection/submission Sept. 6
“first in time” claims
avoid prior students’ topics
obtain instructor’s approval of topic Sept. 8

Outline (or First Draft)
outline preferred
“three level”
detailed
limitations on “first draft” as alternative
development Sept. 8-27
completion/submission Sept. 27
instructor’s approval Sept. 29

First “Final” Draft
“final” as best product
development Sept. 29-Oct. 18
completion/submission Oct. 18

Conferences
informal consultations possible any time
in person
by e-mail
week October 23-27
detailed editing by instructor of substantial portion
general comments regarding overall paper

“Final, Final” Draft
development Oct. 28-Nov. 8
detailed editing by author
best work possible
completion/submission Nov. 8

Seminar Presentations
early drafts posted to Web for seminar participants’ access
random selection of order for presenters
presentations scheduled Nov. 2, 9 and 16

Web Formatting Uploading
author prepare either in
HTML, or
format that copies to HTML
by Nov. 8
instructor may tweak/format, but primary responsibility on author
instructor will upload, make links to papers Nov. 9-22