Molly: Contingency fees generally. The origin and history of the practice. Client reactions to what may, at the conclusion of trial, seem an "excessive" fee.
Scott: A number of proposals, including: How public attitudes regarding the timely utilization of legal services are shaped by the secondary schools' civics curriculum.
Allyson: The mechanisms and practices that can ease the collection of fees in divorce cases when the parties may be contemplating bankruptcy.
Armikka: (1) An exploration of the idea, and design of an instrument (e.g., a checklist), for non-lawyers wishing to evaluate their potential need for a lawyer with regard to specific prospective transactions or conditions. (2) The marketing of pre-paid legal services via Web site. (3) An exploration of the potential legal ethics/professional responsibility issues involved in the provision of legal services via Web site and e-mail.
Dan: (1) The implications of a "loser pays all" system for allocating costs and attorneys' fees. (2) The implications for lawyers' compensation of alternatives to the U.S. system of tort law (e.g., workmen's compensation, the New Zealand system). (3) The economic realities of a small firm practice.
Robert: An exploration of the implications of a legal services analogy to what, in health care, takes the form of an HMO, perhaps in the form of a closed Web site (including the economic incentives to "legal wellness" and reduced costs).
Evan: The economics of attorneys' provision of alternative dispute resolution services, with emphasis on challenges confronting recent law school graduates entering this field. (Possible subjects: how to overcome lack of experience and clients' preference for more experienced lawyers; how to gain a client base; level of interest by large firms in new lawyers with these skills.)
Introduction
Aspects of Delivery/Funding
Mechanisms
Additional
Funding Mechanisms Discussed but not Chosen
Basic Research Sources/Techniques
Research Paper Schedule
During our first seminar session, August 24, 2000, we
made a good start at brainstorming and listing a number of alternative
means of delivering legal services. They included:
|
|
We also discussed some more "creative" ideas:
Note: As you are thinking about topics and outlines, here are some suggestions of aspects of your thinking, research and analysis you will want to include. They are not a "requirement" if they are totally inappropriate to your paper. Otherwise there should be a good reason for omitting them (which there may well be).
Description of Method of Delivery/Funding
Note: There's nothing here unique or profound regarding research, but the following obvious suggestions may be worth a quick review.
Note: This is the "outline" view of a PowerPoint presentation of the papers' schedule from the class August 24, 2000.
Overview
concept of “mileposts”
penalties for failure to meet
maximums
earlier completion encouraged
open to discussion/modification now -- but not later
Mileposts
research
topic selection
outline
first “final” draft
conference
“final, final” draft
presentations to seminar
Web (HTML) formatting, uploading
Research
begins immediately
continues throughout final, final draft
initial survey
initial completed
continuing general
completion “final”
additional as needed
Research Formatting
Blue Book citation form required
why that’s important for your sake
use Internet-available sources
to the maximum extent possible
but not to the exclusion of essential sources
obtain/preserve URL sites for sources
Topic Selection
make list of your topic options
make your selection/submission Sept. 6
“first in time” claims
avoid prior students’ topics
obtain instructor’s approval of topic Sept. 8
Outline (or First Draft)
outline preferred
“three level”
detailed
limitations on “first draft” as alternative
development Sept. 8-27
completion/submission Sept. 27
instructor’s approval Sept. 29
First “Final” Draft
“final” as best product
development Sept. 29-Oct. 18
completion/submission Oct. 18
Conferences
informal consultations possible any time
in person
by e-mail
week October 23-27
detailed editing by instructor of substantial portion
general comments regarding overall paper
“Final, Final” Draft
development Oct. 28-Nov. 8
detailed editing by author
best work possible
completion/submission Nov. 8
Seminar Presentations
early drafts posted to Web for seminar participants’
access
random selection of order for presenters
presentations scheduled Nov. 2, 9 and 16
Web Formatting Uploading
author prepare either in
HTML, or
format that copies to HTML
by Nov. 8
instructor may tweak/format, but primary responsibility
on author
instructor will upload, make links to papers Nov. 9-22