Nicholas Johnson Comment 1:19 Entered in the Western Behavioral Sciences Institute "Post-Truth Era" Topic
of the
International Leadership Forum
(an online, invitation-only exchange on a number of topics)
1:19) 08-MAY-2002 08:23 Nicholas Johnson
There is no "truth." There are only operational definitions
of "truth in context."
Examples:
Accounting. Report of organization's financial data
that complies with generally recognized accounting practices (even if misleading
to casual reader).
Historic. What the historian discovers from early
journalistic truths (even though the journalistic (or comparable) contemporaneous
accounts are, unknown to the historian, untrue).
Income tax. A full report of one's income, taking
all "tax avoidance" opportunities without utilizing any "tax evasion" dodges.
Investment/stock price. "Value" is whatever the market
says it is (regardless of underlying assets/value; see Enron, or many "dot.coms").
Journalistic. What a responsible, professional reporter
uncovers operating within the limits of deadlines and sources who refuse
to talk.
Legal. What the jury says it is (as to "facts"); what
the Supreme Court says it is (as to "law"). (As Justice Jackson once put
it, "We are not final because we are infallible, we are infallible because
we are final.")
Literary/theatrical. (1) A lesson for life that "rings
true" (even though drawn from a story that is entirely fictional); (2)
an element/event in a fictional story that is consistent with the prior
and subsequent story/characters (what, in Hollywood with TV, or feature
films, we assign to those responsible for "continuity").
Religious. What the Pope (or other leader) says it
is.
Schizophrenic. What the patient truly does perceive,
and believes to be true, even though it's "not there."
Scientific. The same/confirming results from a repeatable
experiment.
Witness statement (at scene to police; on stand to
court). What the eye-witness actually believes s/he saw (even if others
present "saw" it differently; or, indeed, none saw "what really happened").
Can anyone come up with more?
In all of this inquiry, don't forget general semantics:
Levels of abstraction (molecular; role of/differences between individuals'
sensory apparatus; perceptions; impact of past experiences/prejudices;
labeling and use of "non-sense" (i.e., no verifiable external referents)
vocabulary; ability to distinguish between (a) observed space-time events,
and (b) inferences); etc., etc.
Perhaps what we are talking about is "social truth"?
If so, and you're interested in considering that in a
context of general semantics, you might want to take a look at a piece
I wrote some years back that continues to get a lot of hits:
What is the "truth" about the relationship between Tom
and Liz, or Susie and Ed, in that piece? Can you find any examples of what
you think should be charcterized as a "lie"? Why do you think so? Or, if
not, why not? If this is not about "truth" and "lies" what is
going on here?